Source Audio’s Nemesis | The ‘Leatherman’ of Delay Pedals

Source Audio’s Nemesis | The ‘Leatherman’ of Delay Pedals

Source Audio’s Nemesis | The ‘Leatherman’ of Delay Pedals

[The Summary]

The Source Audio Nemesis Delay is a fantastic pedal; one that provides a great range of voice and depth of control thereof, attributes often associated with rack-mountable units, all within the confines of a pedalboard friendly enclosure. To achieve this carefully-honed balance, setting the unit apart from similar options in today’s market, Source Audio provides an expansive set of onboard controls allowing for precise/granular configuration of the effect which is then complemented (read: not required for daily use & operation) with enhanced editing options via both a mobile app and/or desktop software. Almost every parameter and nuanced characteristic of the 24 unique delay engines can be modified to one’s delight. As covered in numerous other reviews and demonstrations, the quality of the various delays algorithms is fantastic, faithfully representing the core delay types and then reaching beyond with some very unique offerings. It is quickly apparent from the second the effect is engaged that Source Audio invested a lot of time and resources in the quality of the delay engines (voicing/characteristics). Much like the Leatherman is to one’s toolbox, the Nemesis serves as the versatile go-to multi-tool for one’s delays needs. It is both a Jack-of-All-Delays & Master of Many.

[Expanded Thoughts]

The Nemesis has been incorporated in my setup for several weeks, waiting until having used the pedal in live performance before writing this NPD (New Pedal Day) review. As the Nemesis has been available for sometime, and with no shortage of coverage, I took pause to consider how I wanted to approach this piece so that it brings a fresh perspective to the conversation. While the quality of the delay algorithms (engines) and their ability to faithfully replicate the characteristics of their inspirational counterparts can be a very subjective observation, my thought was to focus on the controls/mechanics and feature sets of the Nemesis; this assuming a baseline of quality with concerns to the resulting effect tones.

Over the past few years, I’ve partook in a methodical journey into the world of delay, having started with the TC Flashback before moving on to spend time with the TC Nova (In-depth Review), the Strymon DIG, the El Capistan (Quick Review), and the Eventide H9. Yes; certainly there are countless other options to explore but, specific to these pedals, they provide a baseline of high-quality delay, each bringing some different strengths and challenges with respects to how the user can both control and manipulate the effect. To this point, the Source Audio Nemesis replaced the El Capistan on my board because, 1) offered Multiple Pre-Sets and, 2) offered a variety of Delay Voicings. While both pedals produce a beutiful delay effect with solid control options, the El Capistan is limited to one preset (requiring external switch) and I found that, in practical use, it was troublesome to make more dramatic adjustments mid-set/performance (note: I have not as yet needed to switch delay settings mid-song.) The El Capistan has a nice range of the Tape inspired effect, cleaning up nicely to provide a passable digital-esque delay, and yet it always remained close to its inspired roots. The Nemesis, in contrast, offers 24 different delay engines that, while many will probably stick to the most common options for daily use, within that subset, there is a great uniqueness of voice, character, and function. They sound great; period. I’ll leave others to debate how authentic they are but I have to believe that even a more seasoned audience will not find issue.

Diving a bit deeper beneath the surface of the Nemesis, in defining presets in preparation for live performance, I used the desktop software to edit/adjust (in real time) almost every trait of the delay engine of my choosing; quick and easy. Further, and of notable value, the user has the ability to make some key adjustments to the onboard control scheme for both global functions as well as each preset (read: assign the adjustment of a defined parameter to one of the available control knobs.) As I navigated through this process, and in spending a few weeks just having fun with the Nemesis, it really is worth reiterating a point made in the summary above: Source Audio successfully targeted and provided a great balance of on-board controls, allowing for refined and in-depth adjustments, powered with what feels like a rackmount delay system, all so nicely packaged in a pedalboard friendly enclosure. With the presets saved, I was quickly able to deploy the right amount and style of delay as we jumped around through our ever changing setlist. If needed, it was easy to make slight adjustments thereof.

[PC/Mobile In-Depth Editing]
Since placing the Nemesis on my board, I have used both the Source Audio Mobile App (via Ipad) and the newly released PC Neuro Editor. At the time of this review, they both share the same abilities to edit/manipulate the core functions and attributes of the delay engines and global settings but the mobile platform adds the ability to publish/download/and share presets with other users. While both platforms are easy to work with, I found it more preferable to use the PC Editor as it provides live feedback (feeling of interaction) between the software and the pedal. The Mobile app only communicates one-way; settings/adjustment set in the app can then be sent to the pedal while, the PC (via USB) communicates both ways with any changes made on the pedal (turning a knob) showing on the app. Either way works just fine, just my preference shared, but credit given to Source Audio for providing both platforms. SA has shared that they will be bringing the publishing and sharing of presets to the PC application soon. These platforms, factoring in the controls they provide, speak to and enforce both the power and breadth of the Nemesis Delay system, well beyond the confines of the physical package.

[Concluding Thoughts]
In evaluating the pedal on its own merits, I am thrilled with the sound and quality of the delay engines, and the flexibility to alter (if not outright customize the delay effect) to one’s content. The Nemesis is beyond flexible while still providing a concrete foundation that exudes trust in a live performance setting. Routing and global control mechanics can also be tweaked. There are, what feels like, countless possibilities within this pedal — like a leatherman that reveals useful tools and hidden surprises every time it’s opened. Based on the needs and budget of those searching for a powerful delay system, I highly recommend the consideration of the Source Audio Nemesis; a true delay platform that speaks to both performance and exploration.

[Some additional thoughts]
I still love the El Cap., one of the few pedals I’m keeping as part of a slowly expanding effects catalog and, while the H9 remains on my board serving in the ‘Jack-of-all-trades’ role, the Nemesis is now faithfully serving as my primary delay pedal/engine. Taking nothing away from the H9, it is an awesome system and powerful tool, Delays and Reverb is one thing is does master quite well. This does then demonstrate/speak to the quality and strength of the Nemesis Delay (having both on my board.)

This is the second Source Audio product I now own and currently incorporate as part of my rig, the other being the Source Audio Programmable EQ (review here) <– also highly recommended.

Finally, with no previous experience or knowledge of Source Audio, I was invited to participate early last year in a Source Audio Tourbox; funny to note: neither of these products were featured in this particular tour. That said, I really enjoyed my time with their pedals as well as interacting with the Source Audio team who, rightfully take great pride in their products and care in their customer’s experience. It was a very positive first impression; one that opened up the door for these future purchases. The following is my shared thoughts and perspectives on the tourbox: https://www.thegearpage.net/board/i…audio-one-series.1537376/page-7#post-21551283

Boss CE-2w | The 80’s called and wants their Chorus back

Boss CE-2w | The 80’s called and wants their Chorus back

Boss CE-2w | The 80’s called and wants their Chorus back

It was August of 2015 when I declared my search for the classic 80’s Chorus over thanks to the MXR M234 Analog Chorus (NPD Review) and, although I did participate in the Source Audio One Series Tour Box in March of 2016 featuring their Gemini Chorus (Quick Review), it was not until this last month that I once again purchased a chorus pedal; the Boss CE-2w. With all of the praise it has received, I could not resist; this, and summertime presented the perfect opportunity to play around with my setup and gear.

The links above provide a quick glimpse into my quest to find a chorus pedal that, in blending the right combination of effect and tone, would provide the classic 80s + 90’s chorus I’ve come to appreciate. While often coming so very close, there was always a nagging feeling that I needed to continue my search.

At some point last year, I parted ways with the MXR Analog pedal; my infrequent use did not warrant keeping it on the board but, I’ve also learned a few tips and tricks along the way that opened up new opportunities for further exploration. One such trick; the ability to use the modulated delays and reverb algorithms on the H9 to achieve a more classic, rich and watery chorus than what can be achieved by using the ModFactor’s chorus (at least in my opinion). Here are two presets (link here) I recently shared that provide a very convincing substitute, if not better, than some of my previous chorus pedals. To note: in A/B testing, the Tri-Chorus preset actually compares favorably to some of the voicings of the Boss CE-2w.

A very helpful addition to my rig, now factored into the overall equation but not previously part of my setup, is the Source Audio Programmable EQ. Placed in the chain before the Chorus, if needed, the EQ can provide nuanced adjustments to the signal helping to facilitate greater flexibility between the various guitars and effects as they interact with the inherent voicing of the chorus. That said, with or without the EQ engaged, I have found the Boss CE-2w to have a very balanced EQ representation that provides warmth but retains clarity.

[Enter the Boss Waza Craft Chorus]

Perhaps to no one’s surprise, and certainly as covered in countless reviews and product demos, the new CE-2w washes over us with the classic 80’s & 90’s chorus effect. As a bonus, and what has become a signature approach of the Waza Craft series, we are treated to both the CE-2 and CE-1 Chorus implementations as well as the CE-1’s Vibrato mode.

Specific to the two difference chorus modes, both are excellent and have just enough difference in personality to make them feel unique. The CE-2 is voiced a touch darker/neutral and with a more subtle blend/mix of the effect; still plenty of movement if desired. The CE-1 is a bit more chimey and the effect tends to feel more present and articulate; note: there is a slight volume bump in this mode. In the past week off use, I have come to favor the CE-1 mode a bit more but equally enjoy both. As for the Vibrato, it’s a nice bonus feature that may prove useful in future explorations — I just don’t have a strong need for it at the moment.

To shy away from making an outright declaration as to which pedal is better (yes, it does tend to be a very much be a subjective observation), I will state that, with respects to the resulting effect/tone that I was in search of, the Boss CE-2w has a solid lead over the MXR M234 but certainly they are in the same ballpark. Each pedal has its strengths and unique implementation of controls but, when I engage the CE-2w, I feel drenched in that classic chorus; period. From Police to Nirvana, the Smiths to Crowded House, these and countless other artists and songs, the CE-2w faithfully reproduces the tones/effect that so many of us have enjoyed throughout the years. That said, considering the price difference and the added EQ and Mix controls of the M234, it is still remains a solid choice and would come highly recommended.

There is a good reason as to why the Boss CE-1 & CE-2 have become synonymous when thinking of what chorus should sound like and, in paying homage to its roots, the CE-2w successfully builds upon the well-deserved legacy of this effect.

The Seaverb by Andy Green Pedals | Time to Surf!

The Seaverb by Andy Green Pedals | Time to Surf!

The Seaverb by Andy Green Pedals | Time to Surf!

Spring is here and what better time to have acquired the Seaverb reverb by Andy Green Pedals. Inspired by the classic Fender Amps, this pedal delivers their reverb effect in spades; it’s soaked with surf-a-licious deliciousness.

A thorough review follows but, for those wanting to jump straight to my concluding thoughts: considering 1) the quality of tone/effect, 2) the build quality and, 3) the price — this pedal comes highly recommended for those looking for a simple, classic, spring reverb; one that is properly voiced/mixed, with a great and fluid range of effect.

The Seaverb reverb is a assembled by hand in Andy Green’s boutique workshop, located in Hollywood, Fl., just down the street from one of the area’s most famous Ice Cream parlours (I share that little detail in case one is hungry when they go to visit). Every pedal conveys a great sense of pride (certainly well deserved), illustrating his attention to detail, professionalism, and mastery of his craft. I was referred to Andy many years ago for his luthier services and, as I have come to expect, my guitars always play and feel better than ever before after he works his magic. As a bonus, the gear-talk and stories shared, while providing a brief glimpse into his years of experience in the music industry, are often both informative and entertaining.

About the Pedal: The Basics

Spring Reverb; Period. The range of the effect goes from very mild (also great for country slap-back) to surf-drip territory and yet, one always remains in sight of the shore; no deep ocean or outer space exploration here.

Simple controls: Depth & Shine. The Depth knob is self-explanatory; in practical terms, it controls the size of the emulated space. To illustrate the setup: imagine a set of springs in the center of the tank with a mic set at a specific distance from them. As one turns the depth knob to the right, the springs and the mic remain stationary but the walls of the spring tank move further away creating the greater sense of space.

The Shine Knob feels very much like a tone knob specific to the reberations of the springs. While the source tone remains constant, turn the knob to the left and the simulated response from the springs/space is a tad bit darker/muted — all the way to the right, and the captured response from the springs/space is bright and chimey.

As seen in the pic below, there is an internal Dip Switch which, when turned on, routes the effect/feedback back into itself which, in practical terms, feels like the reverb is a bit more intense and envelopes the core tone a bit more (read: the blend between the dry signal and the effect shifts to emphasize the effect a tad bit more.)

The Seaverb is a very straight-forward and simple pedal; this is not a bad thing. What it was designed to do, it does with great success. Based on the Belton Brick chip, found in many a reverb pedal, there are many similarities to the EQD Ghost Echo (link to review below) but each pedal has a different approach and end goal as it pertains to sculpting the effect via the available control scheme. Example: The EQD Ghost Echo allows for some low-orbit exploration thanks to the additional dwell and pre-delay controls.

I spent a few hours (on/off) testing and comparing the reverb effect to the Strymon Flint. Both sound great, each with nuanced differences. The simulated springs in the Seaverb feel a bit more relaxed (think: less tension) and thus, the trailing reverberations while present tend to mellow out. The Flint, in comparison, sounds like the springs are very fresh/high-tension and the intensity of their response is a bit sharper to the ear (think: more pronounced). It is not a question of which is better, they are just different — left to the taste/preference of the musician. While my opinion, I feel like the actual quality of the reverb effect of the Seaverb very much stands tall when next to the Strymon.

When envisioning the iconic 60’s longboards, the Seaverb catches the big wave and finds comfort in the heart of the pipeline.

As with all of my reviews, I will come back over time to edit, update, answer questions; jump back up to the top for my concluding thoughts. Sample clips provided in post below. One of the driving motivations for purchasing this pedal and sharing my thoughts was to answer the question, “What Reverb would work well with my Quilter amp?” — happy to say, the Seaverb is a perfect companion; a great reverb pedal and well worth the price.

SA’s Programmable EQ | Yes, an EQ Pedal can be sexy

SA’s Programmable EQ | Yes, an EQ Pedal can be sexy

SA’s Programmable EQ | Yes, an EQ Pedal can be sexy

This will surely be a bit different, certainly shorter in length, than my normal NPD (New Pedal Day) reviews but, no less informative. After a few years of working through the configuration of my board, the project slid into a very comfortable holding pattern this past summer. Besides hosting a few tourboxes, my next purchase was not until 2017 had arrived.

As last year came to an end, I’d occasionally stop by the GearPage.net to see what sort of deals were trending. It was here where I learned about the H9 Max Out discount and, in only being five algorithms from qualifying, I was quick to jump on the opportunity when it went live. Having access to more modulation effects on the H9 freed up some very limited space on my board. The MXR Phase 90, which saw very light usage if any, was replaced by the Source Audio Programmable EQ.

I’ve dabbled with the idea of purchasing an EQ many times before but, for probably the wrong reasons, it never commanded a sense of priority. As much as I have come to appreciate the utility function that a compressor can serve, one might think that I would have given the abilities of a good EQ pedal the same respect. At the end of the day, the idea of having an EQ pedal did not seem as fun or sexy as having some more tangible effect … or so I thought.

Enter the Source Audio Programmable EQ.

In just about one week, I’ve quickly validated what I had suspected but did not want to believe — an EQ Pedal can and is a very impactful tool for one’s tonal foundation. The SA Programmable EQ is placed as the very first pedal in my chain and helps set the base tone before it progresses through the rest of the effects. Specific to my needs, I often switch guitars during and between sets, from a Strat to a Les Paul and, by having the presets, I can easily adjust the frequencies as needed. Thanks to the simplistic setup and operations, I can quickly switch settings mid-song if I want one guitar to sound different between leads and chordal progressions (note: I often use the Ditto X2 to loop the rhythm track live.) I have found that the EQ can give my Strat a bit more ‘oomph’ and warmth (translation: more mids.)

The SA Programmable EQ serves dutifully as a utility pedal, it’s straight-forward in operation is easy to work with while providing a lot of flexibility within the controls, both in how it can help tweak the frequency spectrum but also in how the controls scheme works. One can also use it as a clean boost which can be saved as part of each preset (think: switching to a lead tone: adding a bit of volume and mids.) When using my Les Paul, I have the EQ set so that, when switched on, I drop the mids providing a bit more of an acoustic simulation.

The build quality feels sturdy. The lights are bright but not overpowering. I do not hear any additional noise or artifacts when the pedal is engaged. Not sure what else I can say. For those wanting some more granular control of their tone, perhaps looking for some better compatibility between their guitars and gear, I would highly recommend this pedal. As a Pink Floyd Fan, I will freely admit that knowing Gilmour used two of these pedals as part of his recent Pompeii performances helped seal the deal. If you stop to think about it, part of Gilmour’s fame comes from the fantastic layers of sound he masterly interweaves throughout his performance and, besides the obvious consideration of his skill and passion, I have no doubt that the EQs play an integral role in helping to sculpt his tone.

As with all of my NPD Reviews, I will come back and add & edit over time to update my perspective and experience with the pedal. For those interested in Source Audio’s offering, I did participate in their Tourbox last year. While this pedal was not included, I did thoroughly enjoy the experience and my final review can be found here: Source Audio Tour Box Impressions.

[Update: 16 Months Later …]

Still rocking on my board … just shifted to position to after the dirts and boost but before the modulation and delay effects. With respects to tone and features, I enjoy having this pedal as part of my setup, serving an integral role in establishing a foundation from which the other effects then work with. I’ve calm down in usage, not always having it on but there are times when it is definitely needed.

If there is one critique I could share (perhaps a personal preference), I’m not thrilled with how, when first powered on, the pedal is automatically engaged and has returned to the first preset. Not a deal breaker by any means BUT, it does require that I am most always having to make an adjustment (switch the preset or disengage the pedal) before I start to play. In what should be sort of a set & forget utility role (adjust as needed). One possible work around would be to set your favorite setting in preset 1 and you should be good to go most of the time.

A Day With … The Source Audio One Series 2016 TourBox

A Day With … The Source Audio One Series 2016 TourBox

A Day With … The Source Audio One Series 2016 TourBox

Hard to imagine, it has already been a year since this Source Audio Tourbox was first announced; these pedals have traveled countless miles, traversed the United States more than a few times. With their journey coming to an end, many thanks to the folks at Source Audio for allowing me to participate on what might be their final stop before returning home. With spring just around the corner, like a picture reminiscent of an Easter Egg basket, these vibrant and colorful pedals were delivered to my doorstep

Taking a quick step back to fully appreciate the concept and practice of Tourboxes (as shared in a previous Tourbox thread of mine), at the end of any particular tour, both the builder and the public are treated to a comprehensive review where, with each stop along the way, the pedals are tested in very unique environments, spanning a vast selection of gear, personalized playing styles, and across the entire spectrum of musical genres. It has been fun to watch this Source Audio Tourbox progress, and we have been treated to some great insights and analysis along the way.

[The Final Thoughts | First]

For those who like to skip ahead, I thought I’d save you some time ….

The Source Audio One Series Pedals are solid options across the board; ones which I could easily and highly recommend for TGP members. With great sounding effects, solid build quality, an astute control scheme, along with the ability for future upgrade/enhancement, they are well worth the suggested retail price, if not more. The Neuro App, while a bit rough around the edges, shows some true potential and, honestly, I would consider it an added bonus but not a necessity for day-to-day use and enjoyment of the pedals.
​Having the opportunity to engage in a direct compare/contrast of each Source Audio pedals to some well-respected counterpart/alternatives, I’m happy to share that they easily hold their own ground in sonic benchmarks while often providing additional editing options through their on-board controls. Further, and thanks to their digital nature, users are given the ability to create presets and share them with other users (very much like TC Electronics’ TonePrint feature). For my particular review, I wanted to focus on the pedals ‘As presented’ and/or ‘out of the box’, leaving the App-based editing as an additional bonus – not a feature to be reliant on.

[ The Testing Platform & Counterparts ]

To share a bit about the testing platform with which I demoed these pedals, what follows is some quick information about my gear/setup along with some notes about my musical interest.

Guitars: Les Paul Studio | Fender HM Strat Amplifiers: Quilter MicroPro 200-8 & Quilter Mini 101
Effect Chain: Guitar  Phase 90 -> Barber Tone Press (light compression w/ 50% blend)  Barber Gain Changer (light gain setting when used), → Iron Bell → Musket → MXR Analog Chorus → Insert Source Audio One Series Pedal here >  Eventide H9  El Capistan → Flint → Ditto X2  AMP(s)

As for my musical interest, I generally stay comfortably within a mix of Blues, Classic Rock, and Reggae (think: Floyd, U2, Marley, Cash). Specific to the use of overdrive, I tend to keep things mild using the effect as a boost while adding a bit of bite to the tone.

[The Gemini Chorus]

Out of the three pedals included in this tourbox, the Gemini Chorus was the pedal I was most excited to work with. Having conducted an exhaustive search last year for a classic yet affordable chorus pedal, taking into consideration the limited amount of time I engage the effect, I ended up with the MXR Analog Chorus (see my thoughts and review here: NPD: MXR M234 Analog Chorus | The unheralded workhorse of chorus pedals.) The Gemini Chorus had definitely caught my eye but was not yet available at the time of my search and, while my thoughts about the MXR Analog Chorus have not changed, I now believe that I most likely would have chosen the Gemini Chorus.

Within seconds of unpacking the pedal and engaging the effect, with most of the knobs at their default ‘Noon’ setting, I was treated to the classic, warm and subtle, chorus sounds we all know and love (well, at least that some of us love.). In comparison to the MXR M234, its core voice does not have the same emphasis of mids most often associated with analog modulation but, I’ve chosen to specifically not describe this characteristic as ‘lacking’ as I do not see this as a negative; just a personality trait of the Gemini. The tone knob spans a full spectrum of EQ range, from dark and moody to very bright and HD-esque. In turning the tone knob clockwise, some ‘white noise’ is gradually introduced but not unexpected (think: amplifying/boosting of higher frequencies.) Perhaps better described, the added sound feels like the presence of a very ‘live’ signal. My preference is to leave the [Tone] set at just around 11pm on the dial and, in dry/wet signal comparison, the effect is pretty transparent with respects to the EQ characteristics.

A strength of this pedal, as shared by the others in this series, is the depth of the on-board controls. Beside the standard [Depth] and [Rate], the Gemini also provides [MIX] and [TONE] dials. A common theme in many of my gear purchases and subsequent reviews, the versatility and adaptability of the pedals is of great importance; how it plays with my other gear (guitars, pedals, and amps) along with the range of effect. The [Tone Control], in this particular, case, really helps to make the chorus effect highly adaptable, especially when switching between the tonal properties of the Les Paul and Strat.

The Gemini provides the user to switch between three different chorus types: [Classic], [Dual], and [Quad]. While I believe my preference is to leave on the [Classic] setting, I always feel ‘tempted’ by the other choices for their unique personality traits. The [Dual] mode feels a bit deeper in richness, the bass frequencies a bit more present. The [Quad] settings portray a bit more subtle of effect on the surface (not as pronounced) and yet, there is a very nuanced phaser-ish swirling of motion happening just beneath the waves.

A quick note of comparison: Since I had the capabilities, I did compare the Gemini Chorus to the Chorus Algorithms of the H9, and found the Gemini to be 1) a have a bit richer EQ range and representation, 2) easier controls, and 3) more meaningful options. To that last point, while the H9 has some a great many, and very deep, controls/attributes that can be tweaked in their Chorus, a lot of them (and or the combination between them) just do not seem as valuable to dialing in the right core chorus sound. Not to sound like a broken record, but just with the controls on the face of the Gemini, the range of effect was so vast and yet it only took seconds to dial in the desired sound.

[Digging Deeper via the App … and other related thoughts]

As shared above, I view the Neuro App and finite editing controls as and added bonus; giving the user endless ability to tweak what is already, out-of-the-box, a great pedal. While I come away from this tourbox with a very positive opinion of the Source Audio Series One Pedals, if there is some room for improvement, it would be found with the App & Editing capabilities. When compared to other app/hardware-combo pedals (think: the Eventide H9 Control App or the TC Electronic Tone Print Capabilities), I found the Neuro App to be a tad bit rudimentary; lacking a bit of polish. Some of my more detailed concerns, as shared directly with the Source Audio Rep. (certainly some of which is personal preference):

  • In exploring/looking for configuration options, I think there could be some better placement and organization. Specifically, I was looking to adjust the pedal I/O configuration to Mono-In –> Stereo Out. As is, this setting is found under the presets, not the global pedal settings. As I shared, its not like I will re-patch my pedal every-time I switch between the chorus types on the pedal face.
  • There was a lack of visual cue/response that the pedal was communicating correctly with the App/mobile device. When I went to save a setting or preset, I wasn’t quite sure it had worked until I tested the pedal and could hear the difference.
  • To this last point relating to the App, and I don’t hold this against Source Audio, but I could not get the Android version on my phone to work, which added to some confusion in trying to solve the stereo I/O changes, but when I switched to the iPad, it worked right away.

A final thought on implementation (and possible improvement thereof) as it relates to I/O settings and routing. Without getting into details and/or brainstorming, I just would share for consideration that this particular aspect of the Source Audio One Series might be ‘flushed out’ and refined a bit more. The only reason I really had to use the app was that, by default, the pedal would not route (when disengaged) Mono-In –> to –> Stereo Out. I had my drive pedals feeding into the Gemini and then, from that point, feeding in stereo to my delays and reverbs. It caught me off guard that when the Gemini was disengaged, one whole side of my signal was cut. Further testing shows that the Gemini was only feeding Output 1 to the H9. With the quick help of Source Audio, I was able to get everything sorted but I was left feeling that this should have been more automatic/seamless.

[The Vertigo & The Flint | A quick compare & contrast]

I would not portray myself as a Tremolo Aficionado; my experimentation with the effect first began in the spring of 2015 with the arrival of my Quilter MicroPro. At the start of this year, my use of tremolo was expanded when I purchased the Strymon Flint; a pedal I obtained primarily for the reverb offerings while considering the Tremolo as an added bonus. I was certainly excited to explore the full capabilities of the pedal and it has since become firmly secured to my board (click here for review).

The Source Audio Vertigo, in my opinion, is on equal footing with concerns to the sonic quality and basic characteristics of the effect. While each pedal has some uniqueness in their personality/voice, these differences are very nuanced. Much like the Gemini Chorus, the Source Audio expands on the most common on-board tremolo controls by allowing the user to control the shape/nature of the wave form. Like the Flint, the Vertigo provides three different tremolo types – the harmonic tremolo remains my favorite setting in providing a warm, smooth & subtle movement.

As shared in another thread (link here), if asked to compare and contrast the two pedals, I believe the difference comes down to approach, implementation, and depth of the controls. The Source Audio Vertigo is focused on giving the user full control over all aspects of the tremolo effect through the on-board controls in combination with the Neuro application. The Flint in comparison is focused around a theme based on the classic pairing or reverb and tremolo, providing access to both effects or combination thereof, in one pedal, with a key feature being able to change the routing order between the two. Beyond what’ available on-board there is no further editing capabilities.

Reflecting on the Source Audio Vertigo, by being just a Tremolo pedal, one’s reverb needs can then be addressed based on their taste and any countless number of pedals available on the market. Taking these observations into consideration, I think the choice between these two particular pedals comes down to how one wants to implement the tremolo effect and what their needs are with respects to reverb; all while factoring in available pedal space. Based on how highly I think of the Flint, that should convey a very positive reflection of my opinion of the Vertigo and enjoyment thereof in testing it out

[The Lunar & The Phase 90 | A quick compare & contrast]

By this point, you should see a very common thread throughout this review; sonically speaking, the Source Audio Series One Pedals strides side-by-side with their well-respected counterparts. The Lunar Phaser is no different.

As seen in the picture above, I have a Phase 90 on my board; one with the script mod to help make the pedal a bit warmer, reduce mid-boost distortion, and generally more subtle. The Lunar Phaser, very easily, is able to dial in the same ‘voice’ as the Phase 90 but with a bit more clarity (lacking any mid-boost distortion). Not to sound like a broken record, but like the Gemini and Vertigo reviewed above, the Lunar Phaser gives one so much control and variations of the effect on-board (this before we even think of the Neuro App.) The [Shape] control give us control over the LFO wave form which generally translates to the wave being smooth and/or choppy. Via the switch, we can choose between a Vibe settings, 4 Phase, or 8 Phase setting – each having some unique characteristics; all sounding good.

[Conclusion]

My review focused on the pedals from an “as is, out-of-the-box” experience, but it would be foolish not to highlight the fantastic potential and future expansion built-in to these pedals thanks to the Neuro App/Control Software along with the firmware updates. Throw-in an additional external switch option and the possibilities are really endless. In many ways, these pedals are like blank slate; just load your favorite preset and rock on. The build quality seemed solid, although it takes time to make a judgment call of durability. For what its worth, this might be the last stop of a one-year tour across this country and the pedals are still working great. While some people may not place a priority on physical appearance, I think the pedals have a very nice color and finish, with a very clean presentation of the controls.

Taking all of the observations shared above, if I was in the market to purchase a new Chorus, Tremolo, or Phaser, the Source Audio Series One Pedals would certainly be among my top considerations. For those currently in a search of their own, I highly recommend that you check these out.

Iron Bell & Musket

Iron Bell & Musket

Iron Bell & Musket

A year ago this March, after careful analysis and deliberation, I purchased the Mojo Hand FX Iron Bell – I have no regrets; it’s a fantastic pedal and still remains on my pedalboard. In recently completing a few upgrades and configuration tweaks, my attention was drawn back to the current selection of overdrives and fuzz I had on tap. A quick summary: The Barber Gain Changer serves as the foundation; kept on light-overdrive settings, just at the cusp of break-up, it provides a bit of boost and bite, along with some EQ sculpting capabilities. I use the pedal for classic rock chordal progressions and/or blues-esque leads. The Iron Bell was used, often stacked, to kick things up a notch for soaring rock leads from Gilmour to Santana. On occasion, I would use the Iron Bell for some heavier/alt rhythmic selections but found it less than ideal. While the pedal has endless gain, it remains very controlled – smooth yet articulate (great for leads).

The Search Candidates

In trying to find a pedal that would compliment the Gain Changer and Iron Bell, my search immediately returned to a few of the pedals that I had originally considered a year ago. The three top choices that came to mind: the Vick Audio Ram’s Head 73, Mojo Hand FX Colossus, and the Blackout Effectors’ Musket. As is common with most of my gear searches, I place a greater importance on (but not limiting my choice to) the flexibility/versatility of the pedal; it’s ability to play nicely with the other components of my setup as well as having a great range of effect. With this perspective, the Musket entered the decision process as the top contender. That being shared, I did have some concern that there would be a bit too much overlap between the Iron Bell and Musket as they share similar design approach; that being a modified Muff circuit with mid boost capabilities. I’ll address this with a bit more detail below but I am happy to report that each of these pedals has their own unique personality.

Before continuing on, and for others on a similar search, let me share these two invaluable resources, along with a sincere thanks for the work and effort of their respective authors:

GILMOURISH.COM (check out the Big Muff Buyers Guide and Review)
 – by Bjørn Riis

&

The Big Muff ∏ Page – (check out the Vintage Big Muff Clones Page here) by @Kit Rae

Enter: The Blackout Effectors’ Musket

As Kit Rae shares in his review, the Blackout Effectors Musket is essentially a “Sovtek Bubble Font Green/Black Russian Big Muff circuit with an Electro-Harmonix LPB-1 booster circuit in the front”. A key to this pairing, and something that sets it apart from the Iron Bell is that the user is given full control of the mix between these two circuits allowing the pedal to provide the characteristics of a traditional Muff if so desired. In comparison (or similarity in some respects) to the Musket, and as Bjorn points out in his review, the Iron Bell is very much like a combination of the classic Big Muff and Tube Driver. With respects to my concerns about overlap shared above, these two pedals indeed cover a lot of the same territory BUT, they have more than enough uniqueness with respects to their voice characteristics and effect capabilities to warrant side-by-side placement on my pedalboard.

The ‘voice’ of the Iron Bell has an emphasized ‘nasalness’/mid-based eq bias as a foundation with the user given the ability to adjust to the intensity of the mids from light to heavy. The Bass Frequencies are dialed back a bit compared to other Muff pedals which tends to highlight the stronger mid presence. It has endless gain on tap but the resulting sound is always well controlled which, when combined with the sustain, provides both the articulation and smoothness for lead work.

The Musket’s voice, in contrast, originates down deep from the diaphragm, picking up some raspiness in the throat on the way up, resulting in a much fuller presentation of EQ spectrum. The [Focus] control, depending on some of the other settings, allows the Bass frequencies feeding into the Muff circuit to be ‘tightened’ up a bit – turned fully counter clock-wise, the pedal has a very BOOMING voice. Like the Iron Bell, the pedal has endless gain on tap, which can be further boosted by the ‘pre’ boost control. Where the Iron Bell keeps its composure (the prima virtuoso), the Musket let’s itself have a bit more fun (crazy hair guy); a personality trait which works great for the likes of Smashing Pumpkins, White Stripes, or The Black Keys. A key component that speaks to my emphasized importance on flexibility and versatility, with its three additional controls on top, the user is provided full control over the modified section of the circuit allowing one to run the Musket as a pure Soviet-Style Muff and/or, when dialing different combinations of the ‘Pre’ – ‘Mids’ and ‘Focus’ settings, allowing the pedal to cover a wide range of effect, from overdrive to distortion. There have been times these past few days that I hear the inspirations of classic Van Halen riffs from the Musket. It is through these additional controls that the I have been able to get the Musket to sound and respond very much like the Iron Bell. With both on the board however, I can leave the Musket wide open and the Iron Bell lead focused.

As with all my reviews, I will come back to add and edit as my time and experience with the pedal grows. Over the past few days since its arrival, it has secured a spot on my pedalboard, complimenting my Iron Bell, serving in the role that addresses more of the chordal/rhythmic needs on my setlist.